Social Security Disability Fraud Getting in Danger

Social Security Disability Fraud Getting in Danger

A disability applicant who gives any mistakes could be charged of the similar fault to fraud even when she or he did not plan to defraud Social Security.

More Information for Social Security Disability Fraud at

Social Security Administration (SSA) can prosecute an individual for giving false or any mistakes for that reasons of having Social Security benefits under two names: fraud along with a similar fault to fraud. Fraud happens when a claimant gives falsehoods associated with a disability claim or Social Security records. To become charged of fraud, the SSA must prove the person meant to defraud the federal government. Similar fault, however, is different from fraud since the person need not have meant to defraud the SSA.

So how exactly does the SSA Define Similar Fault

The SSA defines similar fault (SF) within the following way:

whenever a claimant (applicant) offers an incorrect or incomplete statement that'll be essential in identifying the claimant's qualifications for disability, and also the claimant performs this knowingly, OR

whenever a claimant covers information vital that you the resolution of qualifications, and also the claimant performs this knowingly.

Additionally, every other person (just like a physician or interpreter) active in the claim can commit similar fault.

The Most Important Thing Material Information?

The SSA calls information that's vital that you identifying qualifications "material" -- information that may assist the SSA decide a litigants qualifications for either SSI or SSDI.

Exactly What Does Knowingly Mean?

To knowingly provide false or any mistakes means to do this using the awareness that the details are false, inaccurate, or incomplete.

Good examples of comparable Fault

Here are a few good examples in which a claimant or any other person associated with the claim committed SF.

The claimant declared disability according to severe carpal tunnel both in hands. She initially visited a hands specialist who advised her that they wasn't an applicant for surgery, which likely the nerve damage couldn't be remedied. The claimant provided these medical records and also the doctors opinion towards the SSA meant for her claim. However, soon after using for disability, the claimant went to a different physician for any second opinion. The 2nd physician carried out additional nerve testing and came to the conclusion that, actually, she was a great candidate for surgery and may likely create a near compete recovery. As this opinion and also the new medical evidence didn't support her situation, the claimant unsuccessful to reveal it towards the SSA.

The claimant declared disability because of a back problem. Since the claimant didn't speak British, he introduced an interpreter with him to help together with his application. Once the area officer requested the claimant to explain his discomfort, the claimant mentioned (in the own language) it had become a shooting and burning sensation that went from his right stylish lower his leg. However, the interpreter deliberately magnified the litigants signs and symptoms when she converted the litigants reaction to the area officials question. Particularly, the interpreter mentioned the claimant had significant discomfort both in legs coupled with difficulty needed assist in his daily existence with cooking, cleaning, and private care.

So How Exactly Does the SSA Prove Similar Fault?

To prove similar fault, the SSA needs to meet merely a standard known as preponderance of evidence. Which means that the SSA does not need any sort of evidence, or some evidence to prove beyond a doubt that somebody knowingly mislead the SSA on the material fact. The SSA only must reveal that there's sufficient evidence that, when fairly considered, convinces the SSA that SF is available. Discover more about how exactly the SSA defines SF within this policy interpretation ruling on fault.

What Goes On when the SSA Decides Similar Fault Happened?

When the SSA determines that the similar fault to fraud happened inside a disability claim, you will find a number of things that may happen.

The SSA can choose to do nothing at all since the SF didn't modify the results of the claim.

The SSA can disregard any evidence it determines took it's origin from the SF.

The SSA can adjust, deny, or discontinue benefits if qualifications for that benefits was made the decision using evidence according to SF.

The claimant might be needed to pay back any benefits they were not legally titled to.

When the claimant gets benefits, the SSA may conduct a ongoing disability review (CDR) to ascertain if the claimant is disabled, or

The situation could be known to work from the Attorney General or USA Lawyers Office for civil or justice.

When the SSA decides your claim contained evidence according to SF, your choice letter contains a reason of federal laws and regulations on similar fault, an account from the evidence it disregarded, why it thought evidence took it's origin from SF, and information about how to appeal the SSA's decision.

Do you know the Criminal Penalties for SF?

The criminal penalties for SF, if charged, include the potential of incarceration and financial fines. If you're charged of SF, you face an excellent as high as $10,000 and jail for approximately fifteen years. You may be punished even when you won't ever received disability obligations in the SSA.

When the SSA accuses you of carrying out fraud or perhaps a similar fault, speak to a disability lawyer immediately.

Views: 250
Author: Regular Articles
More About Social Security Disability Fraud
Tell a friend
Average rating:
(0 votes)

Hezbollah buries militant Qantar, says Israel will be held accountable

Lebanon's Hezbollah group said on Monday that Israel would be held accountable for killing prominent militant Samir Qantar in an air strike in Syria, and accorded him an elaborate funeral of... Read More

Russia says black box from warplane downed by Turkey unreadable

Investigators in Moscow said on Monday they were unable to retrieve information from the damaged black box of a Russian warplane shot down by Turkey last month, data the Kremlin hoped would support... Read More

Exclusive: U.S. glossed over Oman's human rights record during Iran talks

By Jason Szep, Matt Spetalnick and Yara Bayoumy WASHINGTON/MUSCAT (Reuters) - As the United States negotiated this year’s nuclear pact with Iran, the State Department quietly agreed to spare the... Read More